Share |

Content about Economic growth

July 24, 2012

RICHMOND, Ky. — Desire to increase productivity, improve quality is common thread

RICHMOND, Ky. — Looking for ways to create a more productive workforce? David Carter, senior sales engineer for Tri-State Technical Services, has a few pieces of advice.

Presenting during a webinar sponsored by the Association for Linen Management, Carter consolidated laundries into two types: stand-alone laundries in the business of generating revenue, growing a client base and establishing longevity in the marketplace; and laundries that function as departments or cost centers within a larger organization.

One webinar participant pointed out that a laundry also can be both: a departmental laundry that generates revenue for its larger parent entity.

“That’s a great point,” Carter says. “It’s often what happens in the laundry planning process. When you design and develop a laundry, there is often capacity that is being underutilized. And it allows the hotel or entity to leverage that asset, leveraging the staff to participate in generating revenues.”

TWO TYPES

Carter took webinar participants through a list of business operating characteristics, including the different management outlooks between the two types of laundries, as well as a customer profile, in which a stand-alone business seeks out third-party customers. Although a departmental laundry does not seek out third-party customers—its “customers” are internal, as in other departments within a healthcare center or a hospitality business—it, like a stand-alone laundry, is concerned with the delivery of high-level quality and service.

Carter also focused on the capital investment criteria.

“You, as a laundry director or production manager, when you actually evaluate your workforce, and you want to improve productivity and efficiency,” he says, “by adding a new asset, there are different capital-investment criteria that each of these types of laundries would consider.”

For a revenue-producing laundry, one would need to take stakeholders into account. These could take the form of corporate shareholders, partners or proprietors, Carter says, basically anything or anyone who would contribute a stream of capital.

For a departmental laundry, the capital investment criteria are strictly tied to reducing that department’s operating costs.

He pointed out that two capital-investment criteria are identical in both types of laundries: increasing productivity and improving quality, in both service and linen.

OPERATING COSTS

Another consideration when creating a productive workforce is to consider operating costs, Carter says. The top three are labor, linen replacement costs and utility costs.

Labor is typically the highest number, and linen replacement for a departmental laundry is “the asset that leaves and never returns. There is a physical loss associated with linens (and) that’s why it’s still the second cost in operating a laundry. Of course, with a customer-owned-goods (COG) laundry, there are no linen costs.”

With both types of laundry, utility costs, or what it costs to fuel the operation, is another major consideration.

Along with operating costs, a laundry will need to understand pounds and pieces—the poundage a laundry processes during a workday, and the quantity of items or pieces processed—in order to measure productivity and to set standards.

PRODUCTIVITY

Measuring productivity, Carter says, is a matter of calculating the pounds per operator hour (PPOH) that a laundry produces.

“This is a global evaluation of how effective your workforce is in your laundry environment,” he says. The formula is dividing the total pounds processed each week by the total number of employee hours to determine the PPOH. A higher PPOH means your workforce is operating at a more productive level.

“The idea of creating a more productive laundry operation has a lot to do with limiting the number of physical touches and times employees touch the linen,” he says. “Understanding that simple concept will drive a lot of your evaluation to create a more productive workplace.”

A laundry manager must do his or her homework to document an existing process and the results of that process in order to measure productivity and the true cost of that activity.

Identifying bottlenecks in every step of the operation—pre-process, process and post-process—is another important step in evaluating productivity.

“Once you have identified the bottlenecks,” Carter says, “you have to observe the activity and confirm the actual results over different time periods.” This allows you to know where production gaps may exist or if you need a better schedule for your employees.

Evaluating also will entail quantifying production results, and assigning costs to individual components of the activity, including labor costs, utility costs and even usage costs. Measure the production capability of each piece of equipment, as well as the production capability of the operators.

Identifying production best-practice benchmarks is another step in measuring productivity. This may entail a laundry director or manager going to another facility and observing and evaluating practices employed there. “Because your neighbor may have uncovered or established a process that may enhance your laundry production and create a more productive workforce.”

BENCHMARKING

Observations are key to establishing best-practice benchmarking, but it’s not the only thing you will need to do. Paying attention and analyzing data are keys as well. Identify areas for improvement, research and identify key factors to measure in these areas, and then determine if comparison data is already available. If not, you’ll need to ask or visit other facilities for the information.

Analyze the data and focus on the data that shows a process being performed at the lowest cost and the highest production efficiency. Determine if your laundry conditions can adapt to this particular practice, and then set steps to target a specific area that needs improvement.

“Once you employ a new process or a new practice, you need to understand that you have to continually monitor that process, you have to follow up, and you have to adjust,” Carter says. “When employees change, when equipment changes, when your linen type changes, it has an impact on your productivity. Keep that in mind.”

APPROACHING MANAGEMENT

Determining how much a new practice or process will save, as well as what it will cost, will be keys to approaching management, Carter says.

He says this step can be intimidating, but it can be done with a positive outcome. He suggests a few steps:

  • Engage your organization’s financial management staff to assist. Create a team, and the financial analyst or staff accountant will often become invested in the process and begin to figure out ways to help you present the proposal in the best possible light.
  • Outline the components of the company’s return on investment (ROI). Draft your outline and recommendations, and then share this draft with your financial team member.
  • Finish the presentation in a concise and specific manner, and use your personal style. You are likely to be in a position where you will have to talk with management to lend a messenger to the document, Carter says, and they appreciate the personal touch.

When calculating the ROI, use a simple payback formula: divide the capital investment by the annual expense savings or the annual net profit your company will derive from the investment. You may also need to include how the asset will generate direct revenue.

WHAT’S NEXT?

Once you have the go-ahead for a new process or practice, including new employees or equipment, you will need to examine how to implement the new procedure.

Set the new employee-production standards, and review the new best practice with your employees. Communication is key, Carter says, so allow the employees to provide feedback.

Install the new technology, and then test that your new standard can be met. Training employees will give them the confidence they need to meet that new standard.

After implementation, document the results, and communicate the results to your employees and to management.

Carter suggests adding real-time production tracking systems in order to document the results. Most laundries that collect information manually will take days or weeks to complete an evaluation.

“As a result,” he says, “you may have lost profits or incurred more expenses than necessary. If you had reporting technology in place, you would have feedback on how well you’re doing on a particular process, on your standard and how productive your workforce really is.”

August 3, 2011

ROANOKE, Va. — I spent a lot of time at the Clean Show looking at improvements in productivity monitoring systems. I find the benefits of using one worth the time and hassle of collecting and entering the data.

I talked to numerous vendors that had developed systems to provide instantaneous productivity monitoring of each workstation and employee. The more frequent and accurate the feedback, the better the results.

The ideal system would allow for tracking of both group and individual production data.

I have always tracked three areas in my soil-sort department. The most obvious is the five employees who sort the linen off a belt from an elevated platform into various slings. This has always been a group effort, and their production is based on how well they work together as a team.

My second is the two “dumpers” who place linen onto the incline conveyor feeding the elevated sorting platform. Their performance has a major bearing on the soil-sort group’s efficiency.

Finally, I track the employee responsible for unloading the trucks, weighing the soiled linen and placing the carts in the cart dumper.

I want a system that can instantaneously track the performance of all three areas with a minimum of data entry. The ideal system, in my mind, would be one where the carts are weighed into the system by scanning the bar code. When the cart is placed into the cart dumper, it is scanned again and the next poundage is credited to all three tracking areas.

I want a system that visually gives the employees or the group a graphic measure of how they are doing vs. standard. The simple system of a red, yellow or green light does not provide the type of detailed information I want my employees to see.

The preferred system will also be capable of supporting large screens that can be placed in the break room and the supervisors’ work areas. The break-room screen would provide peer review of the workers’ or group efforts, while the other screens would provide feedback to these key groups as to where their efforts need to be focused.

An employee or group that is not meeting production standards could be lagging due to several conditions. It might be the result of poorly sorted or improperly washed linen; pillowcases that are not properly conditioned cannot go through the ironer as fast as those that have the right amount of moisture, for example. The supervisor can investigate and take the steps necessary to correct this problem.

Poor production may be the result of improper or incomplete training. It might be a problem with a piece of equipment; the supervisor can work with maintenance and get it corrected as soon as possible.

An employee may simply need a little added motivation. Knowing that the system is there, and that someone is actually paying attention to it, can provide the needed encouragement.

The ideal system would allow for tracking productivity of each employee, each piece of equipment, the number of pieces of each type of linen produced, and the production rate for each piece of linen. It would track downtime by piece of equipment and be able to provide laundry management with actual productivity by area.

Labor is our single largest cost, and real-time productivity monitoring promises the ability to improve the use of this resource. I would expect that my laundry could improve productivity by 10-20%. With that kind of labor savings, it would not take long to justify the purchase of such a system.

October 29, 2010

“How can an on-premise laundry manager most effectively demonstrate to administration (or a for-profit textile rental operator demonstrate to financiers) the need for capital improvements and renovation in his or her plant?”

Equipment/Supplies Distribution — Donnie Weiland, Tingue, Brown & Co., Alvin, Texas

April 9, 2010

“To ensure that the laundry I manage is achieving top production on an ongoing basis, what records should I be keeping and why? Do you track anything out of the norm?”

Equipment Manufacturing: Joe Gudenburr, G.A. Braun, Syracuse, N.Y.

December 25, 2009

“There is consistent pressure to produce goods at a rapid pace, based on directives to meet certain individual production figures, but I’m concerned that we’re sacrificing quality for quantity. Can you offer suggestions for how we can balance the two?”

Linen Supply/Commercial Laundering: Duane Farrington, RLLD, Hancock Co. Laundry, Weirton, W.Va.